Compare methods
Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.
| Poverty Probability Index× | Poverty Mapping (Small-Area Estimation)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Field | Development Studies | Development Studies |
| Family | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Year of origin≠ | 2005 | 2003 |
| Originator≠ | Mark Schreiner; Grameen Foundation (now Innovations for Poverty Action) | Chris Elbers, Jean O. Lanjouw & Peter Lanjouw |
| Type≠ | Poverty-likelihood scoring instrument | Census-survey small-area poverty estimation method |
| Seminal source≠ | Schreiner, M. (2016). The Poverty Probability Index (PPI): A Brief on Calculating Annual Poverty Rates and Movement Across a Poverty Line. Innovations for Poverty Action / PovertyIndex.org. link ↗ | Elbers, C., Lanjouw, J. O., & Lanjouw, P. (2003). Micro-Level Estimation of Poverty and Inequality. Econometrica, 71(1), 355-364. DOI ↗ |
| Aliases | PPI, Progress out of Poverty Index, Poverty Scorecard, Poverty Likelihood Scorecard | ELL Method, Poverty Mapping, Census-Survey Poverty Estimation, Small-Area Poverty Estimation |
| Related | 4 | 4 |
| Summary≠ | The Poverty Probability Index (PPI), formerly the Progress out of Poverty Index, is a simple, country-specific scorecard that estimates the likelihood that a household is living below a given poverty line. Developed by Mark Schreiner and disseminated first by the Grameen Foundation and later by Innovations for Poverty Action, it reduces poverty measurement to ten easy-to-answer, verifiable questions about household characteristics. The answers produce a score from 0 to 100, which a calibration table converts into the probability that the household falls below national or international poverty lines — a low-cost alternative to a full consumption survey for organizations that need to track the poverty profile of the people they serve. | ELL poverty mapping, named after Chris Elbers, Jean Lanjouw, and Peter Lanjouw, is a small-area estimation method that produces poverty and inequality estimates for geographic units far smaller than a household survey can support on its own. It combines two data sources: a detailed household survey that measures consumption but covers too few households per locality, and a population census that covers everyone but does not measure consumption. The method estimates a model of consumption on variables common to both, imputes consumption into the census, and simulates to generate poverty estimates — with statistically valid standard errors — for districts, communes, or even villages, which are then drawn as poverty maps. |
| ScholarGateDataset ↗ |
|
|