Compare methods
Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.
| Open-Ended Political Response Coding× | Political Sophistication Measurement× | |
|---|---|---|
| Field | Political Psychology | Political Psychology |
| Family | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Year of origin≠ | 1952 | 1987 |
| Originator≠ | American National Election Studies / Klaus Krippendorff | Robert C. Luskin & John Zaller |
| Type≠ | Qualitative content coding | Composite cognitive index |
| Seminal source≠ | Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. ISBN: 9780761915454 | Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521407861 |
| Aliases≠ | Open-Ended Coding, Likes-Dislikes Coding, Verbatim Response Coding, Master Code Scheme | Political Awareness Index, Political Expertise Measure, Cognitive Sophistication Index |
| Related | 4 | 4 |
| Summary≠ | Open-ended political response coding is the systematic content analysis of verbatim survey answers, classically the American National Election Studies likes/dislikes about parties and candidates, into a categorical scheme so they can be analyzed quantitatively. It applies content-analysis methodology (Krippendorff, 2004) to capture the substance and sophistication of citizens' political thinking that closed-ended items cannot. | Political sophistication measurement assesses the size, range, and organization of an individual's political belief system, the degree to which a person's political cognitions are numerous, wide-ranging, and well integrated. Luskin (1987) developed rigorous operationalizations, and Zaller (1992) showed that political awareness, his preferred sophistication indicator, governs how citizens receive and accept political messages. |
| ScholarGateDataset ↗ |
|
|