ScholarGate
Assistant

Compare methods

Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.

Net-Map (Influence Network Mapping)×Cultural Domain Analysis×Ethnographic Interview×Participatory Rural Appraisal×
FieldAnthropologyAnthropologyAnthropologyAnthropology
FamilyProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Year of origin2010199419791994
OriginatorEva Schiffer (with Jennifer Hauck)Stephen P. Borgatti (synthesis of cognitive anthropology methods)James P. SpradleyRobert Chambers and collaborators
TypeParticipatory tool for collecting social/influence network data and facilitating learningIntegrated framework for eliciting and analyzing cultural domainsStructured developmental sequence of interview questions for eliciting cultural knowledgeFamily of participatory field appraisal and planning methods
Seminal sourceSchiffer, E., & Hauck, J. (2010). Net-Map: collecting social network data and facilitating network learning through participatory influence network mapping. Field Methods, 22(3), 231–249. DOI ↗Borgatti, S. P. (1994). Cultural domain analysis. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology, 4(4), 261–278. link ↗Spradley, J. P. (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 9780030444968Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 22(7), 953–969. DOI ↗
AliasesNet-Map, Influence Network Mapping, Participatory Influence Mapping, Influence Tower MappingCDA, Domain Analysis (cognitive anthropology), Cultural Domains Approach, Cognitive Domain AnalysisSpradley Interview, Developmental Research Sequence Interview, Ethnographic Interviewing, Domain Elicitation InterviewPRA, Participatory Learning and Action, Participatory Rural Appraisal Methods, PLA
Related3432
SummaryNet-Map is a participatory, paper-based tool developed by Eva Schiffer for collecting social and influence network data while helping participants reflect on the networks they are part of. Sitting around a large sheet, participants name the actors involved in a goal or process, draw and label the links between them by type (for example funding, information, or command), and then stack physical 'influence towers' — disks or blocks — beside each actor to show how much power that actor holds. The session produces both a rich qualitative discussion and a quantitative, analyzable network with weighted nodes and typed, directed ties.Cultural domain analysis is the integrated framework in cognitive anthropology for discovering the content and structure of a cultural domain — a coherent set of related items such as illnesses, animals, kin terms, or emotions — as the members of a culture themselves organize it. It chains together elicitation methods (free listing, pile sorting, triad tests) and analytic methods (salience, multidimensional scaling, clustering, consensus analysis) to move from 'what items are in this domain?' to 'how are they organized and how widely is that organization shared?'The ethnographic interview, formalized by James Spradley, is a deliberately staged conversation whose goal is to discover how an insider categorizes and talks about their own cultural world rather than to test the researcher's categories. It proceeds through a developmental research sequence of question types — broad grand-tour questions, fine-grained descriptive questions, structural questions that probe how knowledge is organized, and contrast questions that surface the distinctions informants draw between terms. The point is not a list of facts but a reconstructed map of meanings expressed in the informant's own native terms.Participatory rural appraisal is a growing family of approaches and methods that enable local people to share, enhance, and analyze their own knowledge of their lives and conditions, and to plan and act on it. Associated above all with Robert Chambers, PRA reverses the conventional research relationship: outside facilitators hand over the stick, and community members themselves do the mapping, ranking, diagramming, and analysis that drive planning and action.
ScholarGateDataset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Go to search Download slides

ScholarGateCompare methods: Net-Map (Influence Network Mapping) · Cultural Domain Analysis · Ethnographic Interview · Participatory Rural Appraisal. Retrieved 2026-06-24 from https://scholargate.app/en/compare