Compare methods
Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.
| Mother-Baby Trial Design× | Farming Systems Research and Extension× | |
|---|---|---|
| Field | Food Agriculture Studies | Food Agriculture Studies |
| Family | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Year of origin≠ | 2002 | 2000 |
| Originator≠ | Sieglinde Snapp | Michael Collinson and the international farming-systems research community (CIMMYT/CGIAR) |
| Type≠ | Linked on-farm experimental design pairing replicated and dispersed trials | Iterative diagnostic and adaptive on-farm research pipeline |
| Seminal source≠ | Snapp, S. (2002). Quantifying Farmer Evaluation of Technologies: The Mother and Baby Trial Design. In M. R. Bellon & J. Reeves (Eds.), Quantitative Analysis of Data from Participatory Methods in Plant Breeding (pp. 9-17). Mexico, DF: CIMMYT. link ↗ | Collinson, M. P. (Ed.) (2000). A History of Farming Systems Research. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing & FAO. ISBN: 9780851994055 |
| Aliases | Mother and Baby Trial Design, MBT Design, Mother-Baby Trial Approach, Mother-Baby On-Farm Trials | FSR/E, Farming Systems Research, On-Farm Client-Oriented Research, Whole-Farm Systems Research |
| Related | 4 | 4 |
| Summary≠ | The mother-baby trial design is an on-farm experimental architecture, formalized by Sieglinde Snapp in 2002, that resolves the long-standing tension between statistical rigor and wide farmer participation in agricultural research. A small number of replicated 'mother' trials carry the complete set of treatments under good management and provide the controlled, analyzable comparison; surrounding them, a large number of simple 'baby' trials, each on a farmer's own field and each testing only a subset of the treatments against the farmer's usual practice, sample the real variation in conditions and capture farmer evaluation at scale. Linking the two — the mother for precision, the babies for breadth and realism — yields both defensible treatment estimates and credible evidence about how technologies perform and are judged across many real farms. | Farming Systems Research and Extension (FSR/E) is an iterative, client-oriented research methodology that treats the smallholder farm as a whole interacting system rather than a collection of isolated crops, and designs technology around the actual circumstances and goals of homogeneous groups of farmers. Developed within CIMMYT and the wider CGIAR system from the 1970s and synthesized in Michael Collinson's 2000 history, FSR/E proceeds by diagnosing the whole farm, grouping farmers into recommendation domains who share circumstances, ranking their binding constraints, and then testing candidate technologies in farmer-managed on-farm trials whose results feed back into the next diagnostic cycle. Its defining commitment is that research priorities and experimental designs should follow from farmers' resources, constraints, and objectives, so that recommendations are not just statistically valid on a research station but adoptable on real fields. |
| ScholarGateDataset ↗ |
|
|