Compare methods
Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.
| Lived Religion Ethnography× | Religious Attendance Measurement× | |
|---|---|---|
| Field | Sociology Of Religion | Sociology Of Religion |
| Family | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Year of origin≠ | 2008 | 1993 |
| Originator≠ | Meredith B. McGuire (synthesis); Robert Orsi | C. Kirk Hadaway, Penny Long Marler & Mark Chaves |
| Type≠ | Ethnographic fieldwork on everyday religious practice | Measurement and bias-correction for religious service attendance |
| Seminal source≠ | McGuire, M. B. (2008). Lived Religion: Faith and Practice in Everyday Life. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780195368338 | Hadaway, C. K., Marler, P. L., & Chaves, M. (1993). What the Polls Don't Show: A Closer Look at U.S. Church Attendance. American Sociological Review, 58(6), 741-752. DOI ↗ |
| Aliases | Everyday Religion Ethnography, Lived Religion Fieldwork, Religion-as-Practiced Ethnography, Vernacular Religion Fieldwork | Church Attendance Measurement, Worship Attendance Overreporting Correction, Time-Diary Attendance Measurement, Attendance Self-Report Validation |
| Related | 3 | 3 |
| Summary≠ | Lived religion ethnography studies religion as people actually practice it in everyday life rather than as official doctrine, institutional membership, or survey-reported belief. Synthesized by Meredith McGuire in Lived Religion: Faith and Practice in Everyday Life (2008) and shaped by historians such as Robert Orsi, the approach turns attention from what churches teach and what censuses count to what individuals do - the prayers, objects, rituals, healing practices, and improvised devotions that fill ordinary days and often cut across or ignore official boundaries. Through participant observation and in-depth interviews, the ethnographer documents this embodied, material, and frequently idiosyncratic religion, revealing a far messier and more creative religious life than membership statistics or doctrinal statements suggest. | Religious attendance measurement addresses a deceptively simple question - how often do people actually attend religious services? - and the systematic bias that plagues the obvious answer. Hadaway, Marler, and Chaves's 1993 American Sociological Review article 'What the Polls Don't Show' demonstrated that Americans substantially overreport church attendance: when they compared the roughly 40 percent weekly attendance that polls report with actual head counts in congregations, they found real attendance was far lower, around 20 percent for Protestants and 28 percent for Catholics. The method therefore centers on validating self-reports against independent benchmarks - direct counts and, in later work, time-use diaries - and on correcting survey estimates for the overreporting that arises because attendance is socially desirable and respondents answer with an identity rather than a tally. |
| ScholarGateDataset ↗ |
|
|