ScholarGate
Assistant

Compare methods

Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.

Lived Religion Ethnography×Congregational Network Analysis×
FieldSociology Of ReligionSociology Of Religion
FamilyProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Year of origin20082018
OriginatorMeredith B. McGuire (synthesis); Robert OrsiSean F. Everton
TypeEthnographic fieldwork on everyday religious practiceSocial network analysis applied to religious communities
Seminal sourceMcGuire, M. B. (2008). Lived Religion: Faith and Practice in Everyday Life. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780195368338Everton, S. F. (2018). Networks and Religion: Ties That Bind, Loose, Build-Up and Tear Down. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9781108404075
AliasesEveryday Religion Ethnography, Lived Religion Fieldwork, Religion-as-Practiced Ethnography, Vernacular Religion FieldworkReligious Network Analysis, Faith Community Network Analysis, Congregation Social Network Analysis, Networks-and-Religion Analysis
Related33
SummaryLived religion ethnography studies religion as people actually practice it in everyday life rather than as official doctrine, institutional membership, or survey-reported belief. Synthesized by Meredith McGuire in Lived Religion: Faith and Practice in Everyday Life (2008) and shaped by historians such as Robert Orsi, the approach turns attention from what churches teach and what censuses count to what individuals do - the prayers, objects, rituals, healing practices, and improvised devotions that fill ordinary days and often cut across or ignore official boundaries. Through participant observation and in-depth interviews, the ethnographer documents this embodied, material, and frequently idiosyncratic religion, revealing a far messier and more creative religious life than membership statistics or doctrinal statements suggest.Congregational network analysis applies social network analysis to religious communities, treating congregations and their members as nodes connected by ties of friendship, kinship, recruitment, and shared participation. Rather than studying individuals in isolation, it asks how the structure of relationships within and between faith communities shapes who joins, who stays, how commitment spreads, and how movements grow or fracture. Sean Everton's Networks and Religion (2018) organizes the field around the idea that ties bind people into communities, loose them from old commitments, build up movements, and tear them down, showing across recruitment, conversion, and decline that relational structure is often a better predictor of religious outcomes than individual attributes alone.
ScholarGateDataset
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Go to search Download slides

ScholarGateCompare methods: Lived Religion Ethnography · Congregational Network Analysis. Retrieved 2026-06-24 from https://scholargate.app/en/compare