ScholarGate
Assistant

Compare methods

Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.

Intersectionality Analysis×Grounded Theory×
FieldGender StudiesQualitative Research
FamilyProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Year of origin19891967
OriginatorKimberlé CrenshawBarney Glaser and Anselm Strauss
TypeCritical qualitative analytic frameworkMethod
Seminal sourceCrenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. DOI ↗Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗
AliasesIntersectional Analysis, Intersectionality Framework, Intersectional Qualitative AnalysisGT, Grounded Theory Approach
Related43
SummaryIntersectionality analysis is a critical qualitative framework that examines how multiple social categories — such as race, gender, class, sexuality, and disability — intersect and operate together to shape lived experience, advantage, and disadvantage. Coined by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989 and 1991, it rejects single-axis analysis that treats categories one at a time, insisting instead that overlapping systems of power produce qualitatively distinct positions that cannot be understood by adding the categories separately.Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence.
ScholarGateDataset
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Go to search Download slides

ScholarGateCompare methods: Intersectionality Analysis · Grounded Theory. Retrieved 2026-06-24 from https://scholargate.app/en/compare