Compare methods
Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.
| Historical Event-History Demography× | Historical Life Table Construction× | |
|---|---|---|
| Field | Historical Demography | Historical Demography |
| Family≠ | Survival analysis | Process / pipeline |
| Year of origin≠ | 2004 | 1662 |
| Originator≠ | Eurasian Population and Family History Project (Tommy Bengtsson, Cameron Campbell, James Lee and collaborators) | John Graunt (origins); Coale, Demeny, Ledermann (model life tables); applied by Wrigley-Schofield and Bengtsson |
| Type≠ | Hazard regression on longitudinal micro-data | Mortality estimation and survivorship modelling |
| Seminal source≠ | Bengtsson, T., Campbell, C., & Lee, J. Z. (2004). Life under Pressure: Mortality and Living Standards in Europe and Asia, 1700-1900. MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262025515 | Wrigley, E. A., & Schofield, R. S. (1981). The Population History of England 1541-1871: A Reconstruction. Edward Arnold / Harvard University Press. ISBN: 9780674690073 |
| Aliases | Historical hazard analysis, Eurasian Project event-history, Survival analysis of vital events, Micro-level demographic response models | Historical mortality table building, Model life table fitting, Survivorship reconstruction, Paleodemographic life tables |
| Related | 4 | 4 |
| Summary≠ | Historical event-history demography applies the statistical machinery of survival and hazard analysis to longitudinal individual-level historical data, modelling the risk that a person experiences a demographic event—death, marriage, migration, or a birth—as it varies with their changing circumstances. Pioneered by the Eurasian Population and Family History Project, whose comparative findings Bengtsson, Campbell and Lee synthesised in Life under Pressure (2004), the approach exploits population registers and reconstituted families that record events with precise dates alongside time-varying covariates such as grain prices, household composition and social standing. Its signature contribution is measuring the short-term demographic response to economic stress: how mortality, fertility and marriage reacted, differentially by class and household position, to harvest failure and price spikes. By moving from aggregate correlations to individual hazards, it reveals who bore the brunt of subsistence crises and how families buffered, or failed to buffer, their most vulnerable members. | Historical life table construction is the craft of converting the patchy mortality evidence of the past—burial registers, family genealogies, monastic obituaries, even skeletal age-at-death distributions—into the formal apparatus of the life table: age-specific death rates, the probability of dying within each age interval, the number of survivors to each age, and expectation of life. The life table descends from John Graunt's 1662 reading of London's Bills of Mortality and Halley's Breslau table, but applying it to historical populations demands special care, since exposures are rarely known and deaths are often recorded without reliable ages. Historians therefore lean heavily on families of model life tables to smooth noisy data and fill missing age bands. Whether built as period tables capturing a single era's mortality or cohort tables following one birth-year group through life, these reconstructions are the indispensable summary of how, and how long, people lived in the past. |
| ScholarGateDataset ↗ |
|
|