Compare methods
Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.
| hg-Index (Composite Hirsch-Egghe)× | e-Index (Excess Citations)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Field | Bibliometrics | Bibliometrics |
| Family | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Year of origin≠ | 2010 | 2009 |
| Originator≠ | Sergio Alonso, Francisco J. Cabrerizo, Enrique Herrera-Viedma & Francisco Herrera | Chun-Ting Zhang |
| Type≠ | Composite author impact index | Author-level excess-citation impact index |
| Seminal source≠ | Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2010). hg-index: a new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices. Scientometrics, 82(2), 391-400. DOI ↗ | Zhang, C.-T. (2009). The e-index, complementing the h-index for excess citations. PLoS ONE, 4(5), e5429. DOI ↗ |
| Aliases | Alonso hg-index, hg index, composite h-g index | Zhang e-index, excess citation index, e index |
| Related | 3 | 3 |
| Summary≠ | The hg-index, proposed by Alonso, Cabrerizo, Herrera-Viedma, and Herrera in 2010, fuses the two best-known author metrics into a single composite. The h-index is robust but ignores how heavily an author's top papers are cited, while Egghe's g-index rewards those highly cited papers but can be swayed by a single outlier. The hg-index takes the geometric mean of the two, producing a value that lies between them and inherits a balance of their strengths: it remains close to the stable h-index while still responding to the citation impact captured by g. The authors showed that the geometric mean stays nearer to the smaller, more conservative h-index than the larger g-index, tempering the latter's sensitivity to extreme papers. | The e-index, proposed by Chun-Ting Zhang in 2009, isolates the citations that the h-index throws away. Inside the h-core of an author's h most-cited papers, the h-index implicitly credits each paper with only h citations and discards everything above that, even though top papers may have far more. The e-index recovers exactly this surplus: it is the square root of the difference between the total citations of the h-core and the h-squared citations that the h-index already accounts for. Zhang designed it as a complement rather than a replacement for the h-index, so that the pair (h, e) together describe both the size of an author's productive core and the concentration of excess impact within it. |
| ScholarGateDataset ↗ |
|
|