Compare methods
Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.
| Health Inequality Gini Decomposition× | Slope Index of Inequality× | |
|---|---|---|
| Field | Social Epidemiology | Social Epidemiology |
| Family≠ | Process / pipeline | Regression model |
| Year of origin≠ | 1985 | 1997 |
| Originator≠ | Robert Lerman & Shlomo Yitzhaki; Adam Wagstaff & Eddy van Doorslaer | Anton E. Kunst & Johan P. Mackenbach; Adam Wagstaff et al. |
| Type≠ | Inequality-measurement and decomposition pipeline | Regression-based absolute measure of health inequality across ordered SES groups |
| Seminal source≠ | Lerman, R. I., & Yitzhaki, S. (1985). Income inequality effects by income source: A new approach and applications to the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(1), 151-156. DOI ↗ | Mackenbach, J. P., & Kunst, A. E. (1997). Measuring the magnitude of socio-economic inequalities in health: an overview of available measures illustrated with two examples from Europe. Social Science & Medicine, 44(6), 757-771. DOI ↗ |
| Aliases | Health Gini Decomposition, Gini Decomposition by Source, Inter-Individual Health Inequality, Total Health Inequality Gini | SII, Slope Index, Absolute Slope Index of Inequality, Kunst-Mackenbach Slope Index |
| Related | 4 | 4 |
| Summary≠ | The Gini coefficient is the most familiar single-number summary of inequality, and applied to a health variable it captures total, inter-individual health inequality — how unequally health is distributed across all people, regardless of their socioeconomic position. Its real analytic power comes from decomposition. Robert Lerman and Shlomo Yitzhaki's 1985 covariance formulation rewrites the Gini as twice the covariance between health and its rank divided by the mean, which makes it decomposable into the contributions of separate sources or components, each weighted by its share, its own Gini, and its Gini correlation with the overall distribution. The same machinery supports a between-versus-within-group split. As Wagstaff and van Doorslaer's review of health-inequality measurement explains, this 'pure' inequality view complements socioeconomic measures like the concentration index: the Gini asks how unequal health is, while the concentration index asks how that inequality is patterned by income or rank. | The slope index of inequality (SII) is a regression-based summary measure that expresses the absolute difference in a health outcome between the bottom and the top of the socioeconomic hierarchy. Rather than comparing only the most extreme groups - which discards information and is sensitive to how categories are defined - it regresses the outcome on each group's relative position in the cumulative socioeconomic distribution and reads the inequality off the fitted line. Mackenbach and Kunst's 1997 Social Science & Medicine overview made the SII, together with its relative counterpart, the recommended pair of measures for quantifying socioeconomic inequalities in health because they use the whole population and account for group sizes. The SII is measured in the natural units of the outcome - extra deaths per 100,000, additional percentage points of disease prevalence - which makes it directly meaningful for public-health and policy audiences. Wagstaff, Paci, and van Doorslaer had earlier argued that such regression-on-rank measures, alongside the concentration index, are among the few that properly reflect the socioeconomic dimension of health. The SII has become a standard tool in health-inequality monitoring across Europe and beyond. |
| ScholarGateDataset ↗ |
|
|