Compare methods
Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.
| Hazards-of-Place Model of Vulnerability× | Community Disaster Resilience Index× | |
|---|---|---|
| Field | Disaster Studies | Disaster Studies |
| Family | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Year of origin≠ | 2000 | 2012 |
| Originator≠ | Susan L. Cutter, Jerry T. Mitchell & Michael S. Scott | Jonas Joerin, Rajib Shaw, Yukiko Takeuchi & Ramasamy Krishnamurthy |
| Type≠ | Place-based spatial model integrating biophysical and social vulnerability | Survey-based weighted composite index of community resilience |
| Seminal source≠ | Cutter, S. L., Mitchell, J. T., & Scott, M. S. (2000). Revealing the Vulnerability of People and Places: A Case Study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(4), 713-737. DOI ↗ | Joerin, J., Shaw, R., Takeuchi, Y., & Krishnamurthy, R. (2012). Action-oriented resilience assessment of communities in Chennai, India. Environmental Hazards, 11(3), 226-241. DOI ↗ |
| Aliases | Hazards-of-Place Vulnerability Model, Place-Based Vulnerability Assessment, Hazards of Place Model | CDRI, Climate Disaster Resilience Index, Community Resilience Index |
| Related | 3 | 3 |
| Summary≠ | The Hazards-of-Place model, introduced by Susan Cutter, Jerry Mitchell, and Michael Scott in a 2000 case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina, is a place-based, spatially explicit framework for assessing vulnerability to environmental hazards. Its central insight is that vulnerability is the product of two distinct components that come together at a location: biophysical vulnerability — the hazard exposure and physical conditions of a place — and social vulnerability — the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics that shape how populations there can prepare for, respond to, and recover from hazards. Implemented in a geographic information system, the model overlays hazard-risk layers (moderated by mitigation) with social-vulnerability layers to produce an integrated map of overall place vulnerability. By marrying the physical and the social in geographic space, it bridges the technocratic hazards tradition and the social-vulnerability tradition and became a foundation of modern vulnerability science. | The Community Disaster Resilience Index (CDRI) is a survey-based, multi-level composite-index method for assessing the resilience of communities to disasters, developed in the action-oriented form by Jonas Joerin, Rajib Shaw, Yukiko Takeuchi, and Ramasamy Krishnamurthy and applied in Chennai, India. CDRI decomposes resilience into a hierarchy: a small set of dimensions (commonly physical, social, economic, institutional, and natural), each split into parameters, each measured by several variables scored on a Likert scale. Variables are combined into parameter scores, parameters into dimension scores, and dimensions into an overall index, with weights typically elicited from stakeholders or experts. Unlike secondary-data indices, CDRI is built to be participatory and diagnostic — its purpose is to reveal which dimension of resilience is weakest in a given community so that action can be targeted there. |
| ScholarGateDataset ↗ |
|
|