ScholarGate
Assistant

Compare methods

Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.

Congregational Network Analysis×National Congregations Study Method×
FieldSociology Of ReligionSociology Of Religion
FamilyProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Year of origin20181999
OriginatorSean F. EvertonMark Chaves and colleagues
TypeSocial network analysis applied to religious communitiesHypernetwork (multiplicity) sampling design for congregations
Seminal sourceEverton, S. F. (2018). Networks and Religion: Ties That Bind, Loose, Build-Up and Tear Down. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9781108404075Chaves, M., Konieczny, M. E., Beyerlein, K., & Barman, E. (1999). The National Congregations Study: Background, Methods, and Selected Results. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38(4), 458-476. DOI ↗
AliasesReligious Network Analysis, Faith Community Network Analysis, Congregation Social Network Analysis, Networks-and-Religion AnalysisHypernetwork Congregation Sampling, Congregation Census Methodology, NCS Hypernetwork Method, Multiplicity Sampling of Congregations
Related33
SummaryCongregational network analysis applies social network analysis to religious communities, treating congregations and their members as nodes connected by ties of friendship, kinship, recruitment, and shared participation. Rather than studying individuals in isolation, it asks how the structure of relationships within and between faith communities shapes who joins, who stays, how commitment spreads, and how movements grow or fracture. Sean Everton's Networks and Religion (2018) organizes the field around the idea that ties bind people into communities, loose them from old commitments, build up movements, and tear them down, showing across recruitment, conversion, and decline that relational structure is often a better predictor of religious outcomes than individual attributes alone.The National Congregations Study (NCS) method solves a hard sampling problem: there is no complete list of all the congregations in a country, so they cannot be sampled directly. Mark Chaves and colleagues addressed this with hypernetwork (multiplicity) sampling - drawing a representative sample of individuals, asking those who attend services to name their congregation, and treating each named congregation as a sampled unit. Because a congregation is named in proportion to the number of people who attend it, this procedure automatically yields a sample of congregations with probability proportional to size, from which leaders are then interviewed. First fielded in 1998 and described in the 1999 Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion article, and repeated in later waves summarized in Chaves and Eagle's 2015 report, the NCS has become the standard way to produce nationally representative data on American congregations.
ScholarGateDataset
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Go to search Download slides

ScholarGateCompare methods: Congregational Network Analysis · National Congregations Study Method. Retrieved 2026-06-24 from https://scholargate.app/en/compare