ScholarGate
Assistant

Compare methods

Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.

Citizens' Jury Method×Participatory Evaluation×
FieldPublic PolicyPublic Policy
FamilyProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Year of origin19861998
OriginatorNed Crosby (Jefferson Center); Peter Dienel developed the parallel PlanungszelleJ. Bradley Cousins & Elizabeth Whitmore
TypeDeliberative mini-public methodCollaborative, stakeholder-engaged evaluation approach
Seminal sourceCrosby, N., Kelly, J. M., & Schaefer, P. (1986). Citizens panels: A new approach to citizen participation. Public Administration Review, 46(2), 170–178. DOI ↗Cousins, J. B., & Whitmore, E. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 1998(80), 5–23. DOI ↗
AliasesCitizens Jury, Citizen Panel, Citizens' PanelCollaborative Evaluation, Stakeholder-Based Evaluation, Practical Participatory Evaluation
Related44
SummaryA citizens' jury is a deliberative method that convenes a small, demographically representative panel of randomly selected citizens to consider a policy question in depth and produce reasoned recommendations. Modelled loosely on the trial jury, it gives ordinary people time, balanced information, expert witnesses and skilled facilitation so they can deliberate and reach a considered judgement on behalf of the wider public. Developed in the United States by Ned Crosby and his Jefferson Center, with a parallel German tradition (the Planungszelle) created by Peter Dienel, it is a leading form of deliberative 'mini-public'.Participatory evaluation is a family of approaches in which stakeholders — program staff, beneficiaries, community members — are engaged as active partners in conducting the evaluation rather than as passive subjects of it. In their influential 1998 framing, J. Bradley Cousins and Elizabeth Whitmore distinguished two streams: practical participatory evaluation, oriented to improving program decisions and use, and transformative participatory evaluation, oriented to empowerment and social justice. What unites them is shared control of the inquiry, but they vary along dimensions of who participates, how much control they hold, and how deeply they are involved.
ScholarGateDataset
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Go to search Download slides

ScholarGateCompare methods: Citizens' Jury Method · Participatory Evaluation. Retrieved 2026-06-24 from https://scholargate.app/en/compare