Compare methods
Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.
| Child Welfare Risk Assessment× | Structured Decision Making× | |
|---|---|---|
| Field | Social Work | Social Work |
| Family | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Year of origin≠ | 2000 | 1999 |
| Originator≠ | Christopher Baird, Dennis Wagner & the actuarial child-welfare risk tradition (Children's Research Center) | Children's Research Center (now Evident Change); Christopher Baird, Dennis Wagner & colleagues |
| Type≠ | Estimation of the likelihood of future child maltreatment to guide service decisions | Structured assessment system standardizing key decisions across the child-welfare case process |
| Seminal source≠ | Baird, C., & Wagner, D. (2000). The relative validity of actuarial- and consensus-based risk assessment systems. Children and Youth Services Review, 22(11–12), 839–871. DOI ↗ | Baird, C., Wagner, D., Healy, T., & Johnson, K. (1999). Risk assessment in child protective services: Consensus and actuarial model reliability. Child Welfare, 78(6), 723–748. link ↗ |
| Aliases | Child Protective Services Risk Assessment, Family Risk Assessment, Actuarial Risk Assessment (Child Welfare), Risk of Future Maltreatment Assessment | SDM, Structured Decision Making (Child Welfare), SDM System, Structured Decision-Making Model |
| Related | 4 | 4 |
| Summary≠ | Child welfare risk assessment estimates the likelihood that a child will be maltreated in the future, in order to guide decisions about case opening, service intensity, and ongoing monitoring. Actuarial systems — the most validated form, advanced by Christopher Baird, Dennis Wagner, and colleagues — score a small set of empirically weighted case characteristics into a risk level that statistically predicts future maltreatment, and have been shown to outperform consensus-based clinical judgment in reliability and predictive validity. Risk assessment is distinct from, and complementary to, the safety assessment that addresses immediate danger. | Structured Decision Making (SDM) is a child-welfare case-management system that brings consistency to the most consequential decisions in a case — whether to investigate, whether a child is safe, how high the risk of future maltreatment is, what the family needs, and whether to close — by applying a standardized, research-based assessment tool at each of these decision points. Developed by the Children's Research Center (now Evident Change) around the actuarial-risk work of Christopher Baird, Dennis Wagner, and colleagues, SDM aims to reduce the wide variability and bias of unaided judgment and to target resources where they matter most. |
| ScholarGateDataset ↗ |
|
|