Compare methods
Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.
| Authoritarian Dynamic Measurement× | Social Dominance Orientation Scale× | |
|---|---|---|
| Field≠ | Political Psychology | Social Psychology |
| Family | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Year of origin≠ | 2005 | 1994 |
| Originator≠ | Karen Stenner & Stanley Feldman | Felicia Pratto, Jim Sidanius, Lisa Stallworth, and Bertram Malle |
| Type≠ | Self-report predisposition measure | Self-report Likert scale |
| Seminal source≠ | Stenner, K. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521534789 | Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social Dominance Orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. DOI ↗ |
| Aliases≠ | Child-Rearing Authoritarianism Scale, Stenner Authoritarianism Measure, Authoritarian Predisposition Scale | SDO |
| Related | 4 | 4 |
| Summary≠ | The authoritarian-dynamic approach, developed by Stenner (2005) and Feldman (2003), measures authoritarianism as a latent predisposition toward favoring social conformity and order over individual autonomy and difference, typically assessed with four forced-choice child-rearing values items rather than attitude statements. Its distinctive claim is that intolerance is a dynamic product of this predisposition interacting with perceived normative threat. | The Social Dominance Orientation Scale (SDO) is a self-report measure developed by Pratto, Sidanius, Stallworth, and Malle in 1994 to assess individual differences in preference for group-based hierarchy and inequality. The scale measures the extent to which individuals support dominance of some groups over others, reject egalitarianism, and accept hierarchical social organization. It has become central to social dominance theory and is widely used in political psychology and intergroup relations research. |
| ScholarGateDataset ↗ |
|
|