Mendeley Readership Analysis
Mendeley readership analysis uses the number of users who have saved an article to their personal library in the Mendeley reference manager as an indicator of scholarly attention. Ehsan Mohammadi and Mike Thelwall showed in 2014 that these reader counts have broad coverage, correlate moderately with later citations, and, because saving precedes citing, become available much earlier than citation data. Mendeley also exposes coarse demographic categories for its readers, such as students, researchers, and professionals, allowing analysis of who is engaging with research, including non-citing audiences in the social sciences and humanities. As one of the most studied altmetric sources, Mendeley readership offers an early and relatively well-covered signal that complements citations, while raising distinct questions about what saving a paper actually means.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
Sources
- Mohammadi, E., & Thelwall, M. (2014). Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(8), 1627-1638. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23071 ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Mendeley Readership Analysis: Reference-Manager Readership Counts as Early Impact Signals. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/bibliometrics/mendeley-readership-analysis
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Citation Distribution Modeling (Lognormal/Tsallis)Bibliometrics↔ compare
- Sleeping Beauties and Delayed RecognitionBibliometrics↔ compare
- Usage Bibliometrics (Downloads and COUNTER)Bibliometrics↔ compare