Crown Indicator (CPP/FCSm)
The crown indicator, written CPP/FCSm, was the field-normalized citation impact measure developed at the Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) in Leiden and described by Moed, De Bruin, and Van Leeuwen in 1995. It compares a unit's observed citation rate with what would be expected given the fields, document types, and years in which it published. Specifically, it divides the citations per publication (CPP) by the mean field citation score (FCSm), forming a ratio in which a value of 1 marks performance exactly at the field average. For more than a decade it was CWTS's flagship indicator, until Waltman and colleagues showed in 2011 that its ratio-of-averages construction had statistical drawbacks and proposed the MNCS as a successor.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
Sources
- Moed, H. F., De Bruin, R. E., & Van Leeuwen, T. N. (1995). New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics, 33(3), 381-422. DOI: 10.1007/BF02017338 ↗
- Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2011). Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 37-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.08.001 ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Crown Indicator (Citations per Publication over Field Citation Score mean). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/bibliometrics/crown-indicator-cpp-fcsm
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- e-Index (Excess Citations)Bibliometrics↔ compare
- Field-Normalized Citation Impact (MNCS)Bibliometrics↔ compare
- g-Index (Egghe)Bibliometrics↔ compare