ScholarGate
Assistant
Process / pipelinePaleoethnobotany / microfossil analysis

Starch Grain Analysis

Starch grain analysis recovers and identifies microscopic starch granules preserved on archaeological artifacts and in dental calculus to reconstruct ancient plant use. Many economically important plants — tubers, roots, seeds, and cereals — store energy as starch in granules whose size, shape, hilum position, and surface features can be diagnostic of a plant family, genus, or even species. Because starch can lodge in the use-wear pits of grinding stones, adhere to pottery, settle into sediments, and become trapped in calcified dental plaque, it survives where charred macroremains do not, opening a window onto plants such as manioc, potato, and banana that rarely carbonize. Under polarized light, intact starch shows a characteristic birefringent extinction cross, and identification proceeds by morphometric comparison to modern reference granules, following procedures consolidated in Pearsall's paleoethnobotanical handbook.

Open in MethodMindSoonApply, compare, get guidance
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore
VideoSoon

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Sources

  1. Pearsall, D. M. (2015). Paleoethnobotany: A Handbook of Procedures (3rd ed.). Routledge / Left Coast Press. ISBN: 9781611322996

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Starch Grain Analysis (Ancient Starch Granule Extraction and Identification). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/archaeology/starch-grain-analysis

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

Compare side by side

Referenced by

ScholarGateStarch Grain Analysis (Starch Grain Analysis (Ancient Starch Granule Extraction and Identification)). Retrieved 2026-06-24 from https://scholargate.app/en/archaeology/starch-grain-analysis · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026