ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Social Protection Targeting×Cash Transfer Evaluation×
ΠεδίοDevelopment StudiesDevelopment Studies
ΟικογένειαProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Έτος προέλευσης20041997
ΔημιουργόςDavid Coady, Margaret Grosh & John Hoddinott (World Bank)PROGRESA/Oportunidades (Mexico); Santiago Levy; World Bank evaluation programmes
ΤύποςMethods for identifying eligible beneficiaries of transfersProgramme impact evaluation
Θεμελιώδης πηγήCoady, D., Grosh, M., & Hoddinott, J. (2004). Targeting of Transfers in Developing Countries: Review of Lessons and Experience. Washington, DC: World Bank. ISBN: 9780821356043Fiszbein, A., & Schady, N. (2009). Conditional Cash Transfers: Reducing Present and Future Poverty. World Bank Policy Research Report. Washington, DC: World Bank. ISBN: 9780821373521
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςSafety Net Targeting, Proxy Means Testing, Beneficiary Targeting, Transfer Targeting MethodsCCT/UCT Impact Evaluation, Conditional Cash Transfer Evaluation, Cash Transfer Impact Assessment, Social Cash Transfer Evaluation
Συναφείς44
ΣύνοψηSocial Protection Targeting is the set of methods used to decide who receives a transfer or safety-net benefit when resources are too scarce to cover everyone. Synthesised in the World Bank reviews of David Coady, Margaret Grosh, and John Hoddinott (2004) and the practical handbook of Grosh and colleagues (2008), it spans means testing, proxy means testing, community-based targeting, geographic targeting, and categorical targeting. Every method trades off two errors — including the non-poor (leakage) and excluding the poor (undercoverage) — and the analyst's job is to choose, calibrate, and combine mechanisms so that, given the budget and administrative capacity, benefits reach the intended population as accurately as possible.Cash transfer evaluation is the body of impact-evaluation practice used to measure the effects of giving money directly to poor households — conditional on behaviours such as school enrolment and clinic visits (CCTs) or unconditional (UCTs) — on consumption, schooling, nutrition, health, and broader welfare. Pioneered by Mexico's PROGRESA/Oportunidades programme in the late 1990s, which built a randomised phase-in into its rollout, the field has produced some of the most influential causal evidence in development economics and now spans dozens of countries and hundreds of studies.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Social Protection Targeting · Cash Transfer Evaluation. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-25 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare