ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Realist Evaluation×Contribution Analysis×
ΠεδίοPublic PolicyPublic Policy
ΟικογένειαProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Έτος προέλευσης19972001
ΔημιουργόςRay Pawson & Nick TilleyJohn Mayne
ΤύποςTheory-driven, generative evaluation approachTheory-based approach to causal inference about contribution
Θεμελιώδης πηγήPawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic Evaluation. London: SAGE Publications. ISBN: 9780761950097Mayne, J. (2012). Contribution analysis: Coming of age? Evaluation, 18(3), 270–280. DOI ↗
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςRealistic Evaluation, Theory-Driven Realist Evaluation, CMO Configuration Analysis, Pawson-Tilley EvaluationMayne's Contribution Analysis, Contribution Story Analysis, Theory-Based Contribution Analysis
Συναφείς43
ΣύνοψηRealist evaluation is a theory-driven approach to evaluating programs and policies that asks not simply 'does it work?' but 'what works, for whom, in what circumstances, and why?'. Developed by Ray Pawson and Nick Tilley in their 1997 book Realistic Evaluation, it treats interventions as theories incarnate: programs offer resources or opportunities that trigger underlying mechanisms of reasoning and response in participants, and those mechanisms only fire in particular contexts. The unit of analysis is the Context-Mechanism-Outcome (CMO) configuration, and the goal is to build and refine middle-range theory that explains differential outcomes across settings.Contribution analysis is a theory-based evaluation approach that addresses the attribution problem — establishing whether and how an intervention made a difference — without relying on an experimental counterfactual. Developed by John Mayne from 2001 onward, it works by articulating the program's theory of change, gathering evidence along that chain, and then assembling a 'contribution story' that is progressively stress-tested against rival explanations. The aim is not statistical attribution but a credible, evidence-based conclusion that the program plausibly contributed to observed results, in the face of other influencing factors.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Realist Evaluation · Contribution Analysis. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-24 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare