Σύγκριση μεθόδων
Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.
| Μέσος όρος F1 (Macro-averaged F1)× | Μικρο-μέσος όρος F1× | |
|---|---|---|
| Πεδίο | Αξιολόγηση Μοντέλων | Αξιολόγηση Μοντέλων |
| Οικογένεια | MCDM | MCDM |
| Έτος προέλευσης | 2000s | 2000s |
| Δημιουργός | Multi-class evaluation community | Multi-class evaluation community |
| Τύπος | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric |
| Θεμελιώδης πηγή | Powers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37-63. link ↗ | Powers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37-63. link ↗ |
| Εναλλακτικές ονομασίες | Macro F1, Unweighted average F1 | Micro F1, Frequency-weighted average F1 |
| Συναφείς≠ | 3 | 4 |
| Σύνοψη≠ | Macro-averaged F1 computes the F1-score independently for each class and then takes the unweighted arithmetic mean. It treats all classes equally, regardless of their frequency in the dataset, making it useful for imbalanced multi-class problems. | Micro-averaged F1 computes the F1-score by aggregating true positives, false positives, and false negatives across all classes, then calculating a single metric. It is equivalent to accuracy in multi-class classification and is useful when class distributions reflect their natural importance. |
| ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων ↗ |
|
|