ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Ψηφιακή Εκπαιδευτική Έρευνα Δράσης×Αξιολόγηση Προγράμματος×
ΠεδίοΜέθοδοι ΠεδίουΜέθοδοι Πεδίου
ΟικογένειαProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Έτος προέλευσης1990s–2000s (digital integration of Lewinian action research traditions)1960s–1970s (Scriven 1967; Stufflebeam CIPP model 1971)
ΔημιουργόςRooted in Carr & Kemmis (1986); digital adaptation developed by Lankshear, Knobel, and others from mid-1990s onwardMichael Scriven; Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter Rossi
ΤύποςApplied qualitative-cyclical research designApplied evaluation methodology
Θεμελιώδης πηγήLankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2004). A Handbook for Teacher Research: From Design to Implementation. Open University Press. ISBN: 978-0335211357Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761908944
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςtechnology-integrated action research, online educational action research, digital-mediated practitioner inquiry, DEARevaluation research, program assessment, educational evaluation, systematic program evaluation
Συναφείς53
ΣύνοψηDigital educational action research is a cyclical, practitioner-led inquiry method in which educators systematically investigate a problem or question arising in digitally mediated teaching and learning environments. Drawing on the action research tradition of Carr, Kemmis, and Lewin, it integrates digital tools — learning management systems, social media, video, online collaborative platforms — both as the context of inquiry and as instruments for data collection, making it particularly suited to contemporary technology-rich classrooms.Program evaluation is a systematic, empirically grounded process of collecting and analyzing information about a program to determine its merit, worth, or significance. Applied across education, public health, social services, and policy, it addresses questions such as whether a program is reaching its target population, whether it is being implemented as designed, and whether it is producing the intended outcomes. It draws on both quantitative and qualitative methods and serves accountability, improvement, or knowledge-generation purposes.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Digital Educational Action Research · Program Evaluation. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-15 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare