MCDMDecision-makingRankingMath steps

Ordered Weighted Averaging

OriginatorYager, R. R.Year1988; GIS extension 1997Sources1Related methods8

OWA (Ordered Weighted Averaging) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Yager, R. R. in 1988; GIS extension 1997. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

Key highlights

  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.

Intuition

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

How it works

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

When to use it

V(A^o_i) ∈ [0,1] after linear-max value scaling. Higher score = more preferred alternative. The score interpretation depends on order weights: with optimistic λ (high ORness), the score rewards alternatives strong on at least one criterion; with pessimistic λ (low ORness), it rewards alternatives performing well across all criteria. The ORness and trade-off statistics printed alongside the ranking reveal which decision strategy was applied.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • May exhibit rank reversal when alternatives are added to or removed from the set.

Common pitfalls

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

Sources

  1. 1.
    Yager, R. R. (1988). On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics

You have read it. What now?

Cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). OWA. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/decision-making/owa