MCDMDecision-makingRankingMath steps

Hesitant Fuzzy EDAS (Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution)

OriginatorKutlu Gündoğdu, F.; Kahraman, C.; Civan, H. (HF-EDAS); Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M. et al. 2015 (base EDAS); Yu, D. 2014 (TFHFS value-space)Year2018Sources1Related methods8

HF-EDAS (Hesitant Fuzzy EDAS (Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Kutlu Gündoğdu, F.; Kahraman, C.; Civan, H. (HF-EDAS); Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M. et al. 2015 (base EDAS); Yu, D. 2014 (TFHFS value-space) in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

Key highlights

  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.

Intuition

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

How it works

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

When to use it

HF-EDAS evaluates alternatives by their distance from the average solution under triangular fuzzy hesitant uncertainty. Higher Appraisal Score (AS ∈ [0,1]) indicates an alternative that exceeds the average in benefit criteria and stays below it in cost criteria. For group decisions, aggregate DM evaluations first via TFHFWA/TFHFWG with DM importance weights. Method 1 (defuzz-then-EDAS) is recommended for first-time users; Method 2 (fuzzy-throughout) preserves uncertainty granularity for sensitivity analysis.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • May exhibit rank reversal when alternatives are added to or removed from the set.
  • Assumes full compensation — a strong score on one criterion can offset a weak score on another.

Common pitfalls

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

Sources

  1. 1.
    Kutlu Gündoğdu, F., Kahraman, C., Civan, H. N. (2018). A novel hesitant fuzzy EDAS method and its application to hospital selection. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems

You have read it. What now?

Cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). HF-EDAS. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/decision-making/hf-edas

Hesitant Fuzzy EDAS (Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution)