ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Gewichtete systematische Stichprobenauswahl×Gewichtete Stichprobenziehung×
FachgebietUmfragemethodikUmfragemethodik
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
EntstehungsjahrMid-20th century (1950s-1970s)1940s–1952 (formalized in large-scale government survey work and the Horvitz-Thompson estimator)
UrheberWilliam G. Cochran (systematic and weighted probability sampling theory)Morris H. Hansen, William N. Hurwitz; D. G. Horvitz and D. J. Thompson (theoretical framework)
TypProbability sampling techniqueProbability sampling design
Wegweisende QuelleCochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-0471162407Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0471162407
Aliasnamensystematic sampling with weights, probability-weighted systematic sampling, systematic PPS samplingprobability proportional to size sampling, PPS sampling, unequal probability sampling, importance sampling
Verwandt56
ZusammenfassungWeighted systematic sampling selects units at equal spacing along a cumulative-weight axis rather than along a simple list index. By ordering the population and accumulating auxiliary size or importance weights before applying a fixed sampling interval, it combines the operational simplicity of systematic sampling with the efficiency gains of probability-proportional-to-size selection — giving larger or more important units a higher probability of inclusion while still visiting every part of the ordered frame.Weighted sampling is a probability-based design in which units are selected with unequal probabilities proportional to a known auxiliary measure of size or importance. Sampling weights — the inverse of inclusion probabilities — are applied during analysis so that each sampled unit correctly represents the population units it stands for. The approach underpins large-scale government, health, and social surveys where simple random sampling would be inefficient.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Weighted Systematic Sampling · Weighted Sampling. Abgerufen am 2026-06-15 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare