ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Gewichtete Modularitätsanalyse×Betweenness-Zentralität×
FachgebietNetzwerkanalyseNetzwerkanalyse
FamilieMachine learningMachine learning
Entstehungsjahr20041977
UrheberNewman, M. E. J.Freeman, L. C.
TypCommunity structure optimization on weighted graphsCentrality measure
Wegweisende QuelleNewman, M. E. J. (2004). Analysis of weighted networks. Physical Review E, 70(5), 056131. DOI ↗Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41. DOI ↗
Aliasnamenweighted modularity, weighted Q optimization, weighted network community detection, strength-based modularityFreeman betweenness, BC, geodesic betweenness, shortest-path betweenness
Verwandt56
ZusammenfassungWeighted modularity analysis extends the classical Newman-Girvan modularity measure to networks where edges carry numeric strengths (frequencies, intensities, costs). By replacing binary adjacency with tie weights, it finds community partitions that reflect how densely interconnected subgroups are relative to what is expected under a weighted null model, yielding more nuanced groupings than unweighted approaches on data where edge strength varies meaningfully.Betweenness centrality, formalized by Linton C. Freeman in 1977, measures how often a node lies on the shortest path connecting every other pair of nodes in a network. High-betweenness nodes act as bridges or brokers: removing them fragments the network into disconnected components more severely than removing any other nodes.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Weighted Modularity Analysis · Betweenness Centrality. Abgerufen am 2026-06-15 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare