Methoden vergleichen
Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.
| VRAG: Violence Risk Appraisal Guide× | SAPROF: Strukturierte Erfassung protektiver Faktoren für Gewaltkriminalität× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fachgebiet | Forensische Psychologie | Forensische Psychologie |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Entstehungsjahr≠ | 1993 | 2012 |
| Urheber≠ | Grant T. Harris, Marnie E. Rice, Vernon L. Quinsey | Vivienne de Vogel, Corine de Ruiter, Yvonne Bouman, Merike de Vries Robbé |
| Typ≠ | Clinician-rated / File-based | Clinician-rated |
| Wegweisende Quelle≠ | Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology, 6(4), 269–279. DOI ↗ | de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF: Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (Version 3). Forum Educatief. link ↗ |
| Aliasnamen | VRAG, Harris-Rice-Quinsey VRAG | SAPROF, de Vogel SAPROF |
| Verwandt | 4 | 4 |
| Zusammenfassung≠ | The Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) is an actuarial instrument developed by Harris, Rice, and Quinsey (1993) to estimate the probability of violent recidivism among adult male offenders released from forensic psychiatric hospitals. It represents one of the earliest empirically validated violence prediction tools and remains widely used in correctional, forensic psychiatric, and civil commitment settings. The VRAG combines static historical variables with dynamic factors to generate a probability-based risk assessment. | The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk (SAPROF) is a 17-item structured professional judgment tool developed by de Vogel, de Ruiter, Bouman, and colleagues (2012) to identify protective factors and strengths in individuals undergoing violence risk assessment. It complements risk assessment instruments (e.g., HCR-20v3) by systematically evaluating resilience, social support, motivation, and positive functioning—domains that mitigate violence risk and inform rehabilitation potential. |
| ScholarGateDatensatz ↗ |
|
|