ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

UTA*×Kriteriengewichtung mittels Korrelation und Standardabweichung×
FachgebietEntscheidungsfindungEntscheidungsfindung
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Entstehungsjahr19852010
UrheberSiskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D.Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y.
TypAdditive utility disaggregation — LP from ordinal reference judgementsCorrelation-penalised standard-deviation weighting
Wegweisende QuelleSiskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. (1985). UTASTAR: An ordinal regression method for building additive value functions. Investigación Operativa link ↗Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗
Aliasnamen
Verwandt88
ZusammenfassungUTASTAR (UTA* — Additive utility disaggregation from reference ranking (revised UTA)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. in 1985. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: UTASTAR · CCSD. Abgerufen am 2026-06-17 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare