Methoden vergleichen
Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.
| Triangulierte Tiefeninterviews× | Tiefeninterview – Qualitatives Tiefeninterview× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fachgebiet≠ | Umfragemethodik | Qualitativ |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Entstehungsjahr≠ | 1978 (triangulation framework); in-depth interviewing ~1950s onward | Mid-20th century (formalised in qualitative social research from the 1950s onward) |
| Urheber≠ | Norman K. Denzin (triangulation framework); in-depth interviewing practice is longstanding in qualitative research | Rooted in sociological interviewing traditions; systematised by researchers including Steinar Kvale and Herbert J. Rubin |
| Typ≠ | Qualitative data collection approach | Qualitative research method |
| Wegweisende Quelle≠ | Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. link ↗ | Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803958203 |
| Aliasnamen | triangulated IDI, multi-source in-depth interview, triangulated qualitative interview, converging in-depth interview | IDI, semi-structured interview, unstructured interview, qualitative interview |
| Verwandt≠ | 4 | 6 |
| Zusammenfassung≠ | Triangulated in-depth interviewing applies Denzin's triangulation logic to the in-depth interview method by deliberately combining multiple sources of convergent evidence — different informants, interviewers, time points, or corroborating data types — to strengthen confidence in qualitative findings. Rather than relying on a single interview account, the researcher gathers rich, open-ended accounts from several vantage points and cross-checks them for consistency and divergence, treating agreement as corroboration and disagreement as analytically meaningful. | The in-depth interview is a one-to-one qualitative data-collection method in which a researcher engages a participant in an extended, open-ended conversation to elicit rich, detailed accounts of experiences, perceptions, beliefs, or meanings. Unlike structured surveys, the interview guide serves as a flexible road map rather than a fixed script, allowing the researcher to probe unexpected directions as they emerge. The approach is foundational to qualitative inquiry and is used directly as a primary method or as the data-collection arm of phenomenology, grounded theory, narrative analysis, and other frameworks. |
| ScholarGateDatensatz ↗ |
|
|