ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Systemische Funktionale Linguistik×Diskursanalyse×
FachgebietLinguistikQualitative Forschung
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr19611989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell)
UrheberMichael HallidayNorman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell
TypEmpirical process pipelineMethod
Wegweisende QuelleHalliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold. link ↗Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗
AliasnamenSFL, Hallidayan LinguisticsDA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis
Verwandt12
ZusammenfassungSystemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) is a framework for analyzing language developed by Michael Halliday, viewing language as a system of meaning-making choices where speakers select from available options to express meanings. The approach emphasizes the relationship between language form and social context, analyzing how register (field, tenor, mode) shapes linguistic choices and how language constructs meaning through metafunctional systems (ideational, interpersonal, textual). SFL is widely applied to discourse analysis, language education, and computational linguistics.Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 3 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Systemic Functional Linguistics · Discourse Analysis. Abgerufen am 2026-06-17 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare