ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Swing Weighting×Kombinierte Kompromisslösung×
FachgebietEntscheidungsfindungEntscheidungsfindung
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Entstehungsjahr19862019
Urhebervon Winterfeldt, D., Edwards, W.Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
TypWeight_Subjective (swing from worst to best, relative gain assessment)Aggregated exponential comparison (WSM + WPM combination)
Wegweisende Quellevon Winterfeldt, D., Edwards, W. (1986). Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge University Press ISBN: 978-0521271073Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2019). A combined compromise solution (COCOSO) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Management Decision DOI ↗
Aliasnamen
Verwandt88
ZusammenfassungSWING (Swing Weighting — importance weights derived from worst-to-best swing utility gains) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by von Winterfeldt, D., Edwards, W. in 1986. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.COCOSO (Combined Compromise Solution) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: SWING · COCOSO. Abgerufen am 2026-06-17 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare