ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Stope-Layout-Optimierung×Rock Mass Rating (RMR)×
FachgebietBergbauingenieurwesenBergbauingenieurwesen
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr19601973
UrheberMining Engineering PracticeZbigniew T. Bieniawski
TypOptimization framework for underground mine excavation designEmpirical classification for geotechnical engineering
Wegweisende QuelleBrady, B. H. G., & Brown, E. T. (2004). Rock mechanics for underground mining. Springer Science+Business Media. link ↗Bieniawski, Z. T. (1989). Engineering rock mass classifications. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0-471-60437-4
AliasnamenStope Design, Underground Mine Layout, Panel DesignRMR, Bieniawski Classification, RMR89
Verwandt33
ZusammenfassungStope layout optimization is the process of designing the size, shape, and spatial arrangement of underground mine excavations (stopes) to maximize ore recovery while maintaining safety and economic viability. It balances the desire for large extraction volumes against rock mechanics constraints and support costs. The layout determines mining productivity, capital investment in support systems, and long-term mine life.The Rock Mass Rating (RMR) system, developed by Zbigniew Bieniawski starting in 1973, is an empirical classification that characterizes rock mass quality and estimates mining and civil engineering behavior. RMR combines five measurable geotechnical parameters into a single index ranging from 0 to 100, where higher values indicate stronger, more stable rock masses. It is the most widely used rock classification system worldwide for underground mining design.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Stope Layout · Rock Mass Rating. Abgerufen am 2026-06-18 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare