ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Social Functioning Assessment×Standardized Clinical Cutoff×
FachgebietSocial WorkSocial Work
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr19761991
UrheberSocial-adjustment measurement tradition; self-report scale by Weissman & BothwellNeil S. Jacobson & Paula Truax
TypAssessment of a person's performance across major social roles and life domainsMethod for judging whether individual change on a standardized measure is reliable and clinically meaningful
Wegweisende QuelleWeissman, M. M., & Bothwell, S. (1976). Assessment of social adjustment by patient self-report. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33(9), 1111–1115. DOI ↗Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12–19. DOI ↗
AliasnamenSocial Functioning Measurement, Role Functioning Assessment, Psychosocial Functioning Assessment, Social Adjustment AssessmentClinical Cutoff Score, Clinical Significance Method, Reliable Change Index, Jacobson-Truax Method
Verwandt43
ZusammenfassungSocial functioning assessment evaluates how well a person performs the major social roles of everyday life — work or school, family and parenting, intimate and social relationships, and economic and community participation — and how satisfied they are with that performance. Building on the social-adjustment measurement tradition and instruments such as Weissman and Bothwell's Social Adjustment Scale, it gives social workers a structured, quantifiable account of psychosocial functioning that goes beyond symptoms to capture the person-in-environment outcomes at the heart of social work.The standardized clinical cutoff approach, developed by Jacobson and Truax, judges whether an individual client's change on a standardized measure is both statistically reliable and clinically meaningful. It pairs a Reliable Change Index — which asks whether a pre-to-post change is larger than the measurement error of the instrument — with a cutoff score that marks the boundary between the dysfunctional and functional (normal) populations. A client who moves reliably across that cutoff is counted as recovered, giving practice and research a defensible, individual-level definition of meaningful improvement.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Social Functioning Assessment · Standardized Clinical Cutoff. Abgerufen am 2026-06-24 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare