ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

SAPROF: Strukturierte Erfassung protektiver Faktoren für Gewaltkriminalität×VRAG: Violence Risk Appraisal Guide×
FachgebietForensische PsychologieForensische Psychologie
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr20121993
UrheberVivienne de Vogel, Corine de Ruiter, Yvonne Bouman, Merike de Vries RobbéGrant T. Harris, Marnie E. Rice, Vernon L. Quinsey
TypClinician-ratedClinician-rated / File-based
Wegweisende Quellede Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF: Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (Version 3). Forum Educatief. link ↗Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology, 6(4), 269–279. DOI ↗
AliasnamenSAPROF, de Vogel SAPROFVRAG, Harris-Rice-Quinsey VRAG
Verwandt44
ZusammenfassungThe Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk (SAPROF) is a 17-item structured professional judgment tool developed by de Vogel, de Ruiter, Bouman, and colleagues (2012) to identify protective factors and strengths in individuals undergoing violence risk assessment. It complements risk assessment instruments (e.g., HCR-20v3) by systematically evaluating resilience, social support, motivation, and positive functioning—domains that mitigate violence risk and inform rehabilitation potential.The Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) is an actuarial instrument developed by Harris, Rice, and Quinsey (1993) to estimate the probability of violent recidivism among adult male offenders released from forensic psychiatric hospitals. It represents one of the earliest empirically validated violence prediction tools and remains widely used in correctional, forensic psychiatric, and civil commitment settings. The VRAG combines static historical variables with dynamic factors to generate a probability-based risk assessment.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: SAPROF · VRAG. Abgerufen am 2026-06-19 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare