ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Robuste Matching-Verfahren basierend auf Propensity Scores×Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPW / IPTW)×
FachgebietKausale InferenzKausale Inferenz
FamilieRegression modelRegression model
Entstehungsjahr2016 (robust variance correction); 1983 (PSM foundations)2000
UrheberAbadie & Imbens (2016) for matching-on-estimated-propensity-score with corrected variance; Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) for PSM foundationsRobins, Hernán & Brumback
TypQuasi-experimental matching estimator with robust inferenceCausal inference weighting estimator
Wegweisende QuelleAbadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2016). Matching on the Estimated Propensity Score. Econometrica, 84(2), 781-807. DOI ↗Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗
Aliasnamenrobust PSM, PSM with robust variance, bias-corrected PSM, matching with robust inferenceIPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting
Verwandt65
ZusammenfassungRobust Propensity Score Matching (robust PSM) is a quasi-experimental causal inference method that pairs treated and control units on their estimated probability of receiving treatment (the propensity score), then estimates the average treatment effect using variance estimators that account for the uncertainty introduced by estimating the propensity score itself. The correction, developed by Abadie and Imbens (2016), prevents misleading inference that standard bootstrap or analytic formulas produce when applied naively after matching.Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Robust Propensity Score Matching · Inverse Probability Weighting. Abgerufen am 2026-06-18 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare