ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Randomized Controlled Trial in Criminology×Deterrence Analysis×
FachgebietCriminologyCriminology
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr19951968
UrheberLawrence W. Sherman & David WeisburdCesare Beccaria & Jeremy Bentham (classical); Gary Becker & Daniel Nagin (modern)
TypExperimental impact evaluation of justice interventionsTheory and empirical analysis of how punishment deters offending
Wegweisende QuelleSherman, L. W., & Weisburd, D. (1995). General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime hot spots: A randomized, controlled trial. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 625–648. DOI ↗Nagin, D. S. (2013). Deterrence in the twenty-first century: A review of the evidence. Crime and Justice, 42(1), 199–263. DOI ↗
AliasnamenCriminological Field Experiment, Experimental Criminology Trial, Place-Based Randomized Trial, Justice RCTDeterrence Theory, Certainty-Severity-Celerity Analysis, Perceptual Deterrence Analysis, Focused Deterrence Analysis
Verwandt44
ZusammenfassungA randomized controlled trial (RCT) in criminology evaluates a justice intervention — such as hot-spots policing, a deterrence message, or a reentry program — by randomly assigning units (places, people, or cases) to receive the intervention or to serve as controls. Because assignment is by chance, treatment and control groups are statistically equivalent at baseline, so any later difference in crime or reoffending can be attributed to the intervention rather than to selection. Sherman and Weisburd's 1995 Minneapolis hot-spots patrol experiment helped establish the design as the gold standard of experimental criminology.Deterrence analysis studies how the threat and imposition of legal punishment discourage crime. Rooted in classical criminology and formalized in Gary Becker's economic model, it distinguishes the certainty, severity, and celerity of punishment, separates perceived from objective sanction risk, and uses quasi-experimental and perceptual evidence — synthesized by Daniel Nagin — to test how much, and through what channels, punishment actually deters.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Randomized Controlled Trial in Criminology · Deterrence Analysis. Abgerufen am 2026-06-24 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare