ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

qR-TOPSIS×Kriteriums-Impact-LOSs-objektive Gewichtungsmethode×
FachgebietEntscheidungsfindungEntscheidungsfindung
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Entstehungsjahr20172016
UrheberYager, R. R.Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
Typq-Rung Orthopair outranking/ranking — q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Number (q-ROFN: μ, ν; μ^q+ν^q ≤ 1, q ≥ 1)Relative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
Wegweisende QuelleYager, R. R. (2017). Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
Aliasnamen
Verwandt88
ZusammenfassungQR-TOPSIS (qR-TOPSIS — q-Rung Orthopair extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Yager, R. R. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: QR-TOPSIS · CILOS. Abgerufen am 2026-06-18 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare