ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Prompt Engineering×Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)×
FachgebietText MiningText Mining
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr2020 (few-shot prompting); 2022 (chain-of-thought)2020
UrheberTom Brown et al. (GPT-3 / few-shot framing, 2020); chain-of-thought extended by Jason Wei et al. (2022)Lewis, Patrick et al. (Meta AI / Facebook AI Research)
TypNLP pipeline — structured instruction design for large language modelsHybrid retrieval + generation pipeline
Wegweisende QuelleBrown, T. et al. (2020). Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 33, 1877-1901. link ↗Lewis, P. et al. (2020). Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 33, 9459-9474. DOI ↗
Aliasnameninstruction design, LLM prompting, Yönerge Mühendisliği (Prompt Engineering)RAG, retrieval-augmented LLM, grounded generation, Erişim Destekli Metin Üretimi (RAG)
Verwandt77
ZusammenfassungPrompt engineering is the practice of crafting structured natural-language instructions — prompts — to elicit targeted outputs from large language models (LLMs). Formalised by Brown et al. (2020) in the context of GPT-3 and extended by Wei et al. (2022) with chain-of-thought prompting, it encompasses four main strategies: zero-shot, few-shot, chain-of-thought, and tree-of-thought. Rather than re-training a model, the analyst shapes the model's behaviour entirely through the design of the input text.Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a natural-language-processing pipeline introduced by Lewis et al. in 2020 that strengthens a large language model (LLM) with evidence fetched at inference time from an external knowledge base. Instead of relying solely on what a model memorised during training, RAG first retrieves the most relevant passages from a document index and then hands those passages to the LLM as context, grounding the generated answer in verifiable, up-to-date information. The approach reduces hallucination and allows domain-specific or time-sensitive knowledge to be injected without retraining the model.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Prompt Engineering · Retrieval-Augmented Generation. Abgerufen am 2026-06-17 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare