Methoden vergleichen
Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.
| PROMETHEE I× | ANP× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fachgebiet | Entscheidungsfindung | Entscheidungsfindung |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Entstehungsjahr≠ | 1986 | 1996 |
| Urheber≠ | Brans, J. P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Typ≠ | Outranking via positive/negative flows (partial preorder) | Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure) |
| Wegweisende Quelle≠ | Brans, J. P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8 |
| Aliasnamen | — | — |
| Verwandt | 8 | 8 |
| Zusammenfassung≠ | PROMETHEE-I (PROMETHEE I — Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment Evaluations I (partial ranking)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Brans, J. P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B. in 1986. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatensatz ↗ |
|
|