ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Probabilistisch-linguistische Erweiterung von TOPSIS×Kriterien-Auswirkungs-Messsystem×
FachgebietEntscheidungsfindungEntscheidungsfindung
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Entstehungsjahr20192025
UrheberLu, J., Wei, C.Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N.
TypProbabilistic Linguistic outranking/ranking — Probabilistic Linguistic Term Set (PLTS: {L_k|p_k})Impact-based weighted scoring (criterion-level deviation analysis)
Wegweisende QuelleLu, J., Wei, C. (2019). TOPSIS Method for Probabilistic Linguistic MAGDM with Entropy Weight and Its Application to Supplier Selection of New Agricultural Machinery Products. Entropy DOI ↗Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. (2025). A New Criteria Importance Assessment (CIMAS) Method in Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making: Criteria Evaluation for Supplier Selection. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS — Series: Mechanical Engineering DOI ↗
Aliasnamen
Verwandt88
ZusammenfassungPL-TOPSIS (Probabilistic Linguistic extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Lu, J., Wei, C. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CIMAS (Criterion Impact MeAsurement System) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. in 2025. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: PL-TOPSIS · CIMAS. Abgerufen am 2026-06-18 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare