ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Probabilistisch-linguistische Erweiterung von TOPSIS×Kriteriums-Impact-LOSs-objektive Gewichtungsmethode×
FachgebietEntscheidungsfindungEntscheidungsfindung
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Entstehungsjahr20192016
UrheberLu, J., Wei, C.Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
TypProbabilistic Linguistic outranking/ranking — Probabilistic Linguistic Term Set (PLTS: {L_k|p_k})Relative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
Wegweisende QuelleLu, J., Wei, C. (2019). TOPSIS Method for Probabilistic Linguistic MAGDM with Entropy Weight and Its Application to Supplier Selection of New Agricultural Machinery Products. Entropy DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
Aliasnamen
Verwandt88
ZusammenfassungPL-TOPSIS (Probabilistic Linguistic extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Lu, J., Wei, C. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: PL-TOPSIS · CILOS. Abgerufen am 2026-06-18 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare