Methoden vergleichen

	Probabilistische Hesitante Erweiterung von COPRAS	Analytic Hierarchy Process	CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation
Fachgebiet	Entscheidungsfindung	Entscheidungsfindung	Entscheidungsfindung
Familie	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Entstehungsjahr	2021	1980	1995
Urheber	Song, H. F. Chen, Z. C.	Saaty, T. L.	Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
Typ	Probabilistic Hesitant ranking — Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Element (PHFE: {γ|p} pairs)	Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)	Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Wegweisende Quelle	Song, H. F., Chen, Z. C. (2021). Multi-attribute decision-making method based distance and COPRAS method with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems	Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713	Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research
Aliasnamen	—	—	—
Verwandt	8	8	8
Zusammenfassung	PHF-COPRAS (Probabilistic Hesitant extension of COPRAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Song, H. F. Chen, Z. C. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.