Methoden vergleichen
Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.
| Neues Verfahren zur Bestimmung objektiver Kriteriengewichte× | Additive Ratio Assessment× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fachgebiet | Entscheidungsfindung | Entscheidungsfindung |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Entstehungsjahr≠ | 2017 | 2010 |
| Urheber≠ | Bulut, E. | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. |
| Typ≠ | Weight_Objective (normalised matrix column-mean based) | Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row) |
| Wegweisende Quelle≠ | Bulut, E. (2017). A comparative analysis of the criteria weights determination methods for selection of ship propulsion system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment link ↗ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗ |
| Aliasnamen | — | — |
| Verwandt | 8 | 8 |
| Zusammenfassung≠ | NMD (New Method of Determining objective criterion weights) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bulut, E. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatensatz ↗ |
|
|