ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Neuartiger Ansatz für unpräzise Bewertung und Entscheidungsumgebungen×Kriteriums-Impact-LOSs-objektive Gewichtungsmethode×
FachgebietEntscheidungsfindungEntscheidungsfindung
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Entstehungsjahr19952016
UrheberMunda, G.Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
TypFuzzy pairwise equity/inequality comparison (semantic distance)Relative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
Wegweisende QuelleMunda, G. (1995). Multicriteria Evaluation in a Fuzzy Environment: Theory and Applications in Ecological Economics. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
Aliasnamen
Verwandt88
ZusammenfassungNAIADE (Novel Approach to Imprecise Assessment and Decision Environments) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Munda, G. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: NAIADE · CILOS. Abgerufen am 2026-06-17 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare