ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Neutrosophische Erweiterung von GRA×Kriteriengewichtung mittels Korrelation und Standardabweichung×
FachgebietEntscheidungsfindungEntscheidungsfindung
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Entstehungsjahr20142010
UrheberBiswas, P., Pramanik, S., Giri, B. C.Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y.
TypNeutrosophic outranking/ranking — Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3)Correlation-penalised standard-deviation weighting
Wegweisende QuelleBiswas, P., Pramanik, S., Giri, B. C. (2014). Entropy based grey relational analysis method for multi-attribute decision-making under single valued neutrosophic assessments. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems DOI ↗Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗
Aliasnamen
Verwandt88
ZusammenfassungN-GRA (Neutrosophic extension of GRA) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Biswas, P., Pramanik, S., Giri, B. C. in 2014. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: N-GRA · CCSD. Abgerufen am 2026-06-17 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare