Methoden vergleichen
Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.
| Multiple Case-Based Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis× | Hermeneutische Phänomenologie× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fachgebiet | Qualitativ | Qualitativ |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Entstehungsjahr≠ | 1996 (IPA); multi-case design consolidated circa 2009 | Philosophical roots 1927 (Heidegger); systematic research method from 1980s–1990s |
| Urheber≠ | Jonathan A. Smith (IPA); multi-case extension elaborated by Smith, Flowers & Larkin | Martin Heidegger (philosophical foundation); Max van Manen (methodological application) |
| Typ≠ | Qualitative interpretive research design | Qualitative research method |
| Wegweisende Quelle≠ | Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-1412908344 | van Manen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978-0791404645 |
| Aliasnamen | multi-case IPA, multiple-case IPA, cross-case interpretive phenomenological analysis, IPA multiple case design | Heideggerian phenomenology, interpretive phenomenology, hermeneutic inquiry, van Manen phenomenology |
| Verwandt≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Zusammenfassung≠ | Multiple case-based interpretive phenomenological analysis (multi-case IPA) applies the close, idiographic reading of IPA to a set of purposively selected cases, conducting detailed within-case analysis before systematically comparing themes across cases. The approach retains IPA's commitment to understanding individual lived experience in depth while allowing the researcher to identify convergent and divergent patterns across structurally similar situations or participant groups. | Hermeneutic phenomenology is a qualitative research approach that investigates the interpreted meaning of lived experience from within the existential conditions that shape it. Rooted in Heidegger's ontology and developed as an empirical method by Max van Manen, it does not seek to bracket or suspend the researcher's understanding but instead treats that understanding as the very medium through which the meaning of experience can be disclosed. The approach is widely used in education, nursing, and social sciences to explore how people dwell in, and make sense of, their world. |
| ScholarGateDatensatz ↗ |
|
|