ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Multi-Source-Tiefeninterview×Multi-Source-Fokusgruppe – Qualitative Datenerhebung mit mehreren Stakeholdern×
FachgebietUmfragemethodikUmfragemethodik
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr1980s–1990s (formalized in qualitative inquiry literature)1980s–1990s
UrheberGrounded in qualitative traditions consolidated by Patton, Lincoln & Guba, and othersDeveloped from focus group methodology; formalized in applied social research (Krueger, Morgan, and colleagues)
TypQualitative data collection techniqueQualitative data collection technique
Wegweisende QuellePatton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483365244
Aliasnamenmulti-informant in-depth interview, multi-perspective qualitative interview, multiple-source IDI, multi-stakeholder in-depth interviewmulti-stakeholder focus group, multiple-source focus group, cross-source focus group, MSFG
Verwandt54
ZusammenfassungThe multi-source in-depth interview is a qualitative data collection strategy in which extended, open-ended interviews are conducted with participants drawn from two or more distinct source groups — such as providers and clients, managers and staff, or experts and laypeople. Collecting data across diverse informant positions enriches description and enables the researcher to examine a phenomenon from multiple vantage points within a single study.The multi-source focus group method extends the standard focus group design by deliberately recruiting participants from two or more distinct stakeholder groups — for example, clinicians and patients, teachers and students, or managers and frontline staff. Separate sessions are held for each source group using a shared discussion protocol, and the resulting data are analyzed both within each group and across groups to reveal convergences, tensions, and perspectives that no single-source design could uncover.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Multi-source In-depth Interview · Multi-source Focus Group. Abgerufen am 2026-06-15 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare