Methoden vergleichen
Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.
| Multi-Group Item Response Theory (MG-IRT)× | Multigruppen-konfirmatorische Faktorenanalyse (MG-KFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fachgebiet | Psychometrie | Psychometrie |
| Familie | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Entstehungsjahr≠ | 1990s | 1971 |
| Urheber≠ | Multiple contributors; formalized by Birnbaum (1968) for IRT; multi-group extensions developed through 1980s–1990s | Karl Jöreskog |
| Typ≠ | Latent trait / measurement invariance | Measurement model / invariance test |
| Wegweisende Quelle≠ | Embretson, S. E. & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805828191 | Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ |
| Aliasnamen | MG-IRT, multiple-group IRT, multi-group latent trait model, IRT across groups | MG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA |
| Verwandt | 6 | 6 |
| Zusammenfassung≠ | Multi-group item response theory fits IRT models simultaneously across two or more defined groups — such as males and females, or different cultural samples — to determine whether item parameters are invariant across those groups. It is the primary IRT-based framework for testing measurement equivalence and detecting differential item functioning (DIF) at the model level. | Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified. |
| ScholarGateDatensatz ↗ |
|
|