ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Multi-Attribute Utility Theory×Kriteriums-Impact-LOSs-objektive Gewichtungsmethode×
FachgebietEntscheidungsfindungEntscheidungsfindung
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Entstehungsjahr19762016
UrheberKeeney, R. L., Raiffa, H.Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
TypAdditive multi-attribute utility functionRelative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
Wegweisende QuelleKeeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs. Wiley ISBN: 978-0-521-43883-4Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
Aliasnamen
Verwandt88
ZusammenfassungMAUT (Multi-Attribute Utility Theory) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. in 1976. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: MAUT · CILOS. Abgerufen am 2026-06-17 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare