ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Maschinelles Lernen-gestützte Propensity-Score-Matching×Propensity Score Weighting (PSW / IPW)×
FachgebietKausale InferenzKausale Inferenz
FamilieRegression modelRegression model
Entstehungsjahr20041983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
UrheberMcCaffrey, Ridgeway & Morral (2004); Westreich, Lessler & Funk (2010)Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TypCausal inference / matchingCausal inference / reweighting
Wegweisende QuelleMcCaffrey, D. F., Ridgeway, G., & Morral, A. R. (2004). Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 403-425. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
AliasnamenML-PSM, boosted propensity score matching, ML-augmented PSM, nonparametric propensity score matchingPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Verwandt66
ZusammenfassungMachine learning-augmented propensity score matching (ML-PSM) replaces the traditional logistic regression used to estimate propensity scores with flexible machine learning algorithms — such as gradient boosted trees, random forests, or LASSO — to better capture complex, nonlinear relationships among covariates. The resulting richer propensity scores improve covariate balance and reduce bias in the estimated average treatment effect on the treated (ATT).Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Machine Learning-Augmented Propensity Score Matching · Propensity Score Weighting. Abgerufen am 2026-06-18 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare